CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE

INTRODUCTION

UNIT 1. INTRODUCTION TO QUALITY MANAGEMENT

UNIT 2. EVOLUTION

UNIT 3. CUSTOMER FOCUS

REVIEW units 1-3

UNIT 4. LEADERSHIP

UNIT 5. ENGAGEMENT OF PEOPLE

UNIT 6. PROCESS APPROACH

REVIEW units 4-6

UNIT 7. IMPROVEMENT

UNIT 8.EVIDENCE BASED DECISION MAKING

UNIT 9. RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT

REVIEW units 7-9

UNIT 10. QUALITY STANDARDS

UNIT 11. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE

UNIT 12. QUALITY CONTROL

REVIEW units 10-12

UNIT 13. QUALITY ASSURANCE

UNIT 14. SERVICE QUALITY

REVIEW units13-14

APPENDIX

CONCLUSION

CONCLUSION

REFERENCES & RESOURCES

UNIT 2. EVOLUTION

 

Part A

The history of quality management can be traced all the way back to The Middle Ages. Work completed by journeymen and apprentices were evaluated and inspected by the skilled worker to ensure that quality standards were met in all aspects of the finished product, ensuring satisfaction of the buyer. And while the history of quality management has gone through a number of changes since that time, the end goal is still the same.

It was during the 1920’s when quality management systems, as we know them today, started to surface. While the focus of quality management was still on the end product, it was the first time that statistical theory was applied to product quality control.

Product quality control was determined through inspections. This involved measuring, examining and testing the products, processes and services against specific requirements to ensure that each element adhered to set standards and guidelines.

This algorithm worked for quite some time. Over time, however, businesses began to grow and expand. More and more products were manufactured throughout the day.

Companies started to experience difficulties in following through with quality control standards. It became evident that there was a great need for change and development.

 Change and development were brought forth during the 1940’s by industry leaders and experts like Deming, Dodge, Juran and Roming. This would be the beginning of Total Quality Management as we know it today.

Inspections were now carried out by production personnel. They were responsible for inspections during specific production intervals. This would change the focus from simply inspecting the end product to actually preventing end product problems through early detection on the production line.

It was also during the 1940’s that Japan caught wind of Total Quality Management. At that time, Japanese products were considered poor quality imitations. Hearing about the success of quality management in the west, Japan employed the assistance of quality management experts like Deming and Juran. Little did the Western culture know at that time, Japan would soon push the envelope and set new standards in TQM.

During the first international quality management conference in 1969, Feigenbaum would first use the phrase Total Quality Management. Feigenbaum, however, would not meet the depth of understanding of the term that Japanese attendee and speaker, Ishikawa would. Ishikawa would indicate during the conference that TQM should apply to all employees within the organization – from the workers to the head management.

The Western culture would soon catch up, however. By the 1980’s, the Western culture would take notice of Japan’s success and start to set and adhere to higher Total Quality Management guidelines. At this time, however, it was unclear as to what exactly TQM involved.

The U.S. Government would soon be responsible for making those guidelines and standards clear with their development of the Malcolm Baldrige Award; an award that could be won by businesses that exhibited quality management excellence. Other countries, like Europe, would follow in the United States» footsteps and develop similar awards.

Today, companies all over the globe compete for the hundreds of Excellence Awards now given. The purpose of quality management, however, still remains the same as it has, all through history – to ensure that customers receive an excellent, quality product.

 

EXERCISES

1. Sum up the main ides of the text and retell it in Russian.

 

2. 2. Fill in the missing words from the box into the text below.

developed       competitive      finished       broadcast

began     economic     origin     during      describe

 

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the 1)_______ countries of North America and Western Europe suffered economically in the face of stiff competition from Japan's ability to produce high-quality goods at 2)_______ cost. For the first time since the start of the Industrial Revolution, the United Kingdom became a net importer of 3)_______ goods. The United States undertook its own soul-searching, expressed most pointedly in the television 4)_______ of If Japan Can... Why Can't We? Firms 5)_______ reexamining the techniques of quality control invented over the past 50 years and how those techniques had been so successfully employed by the Japanese. It was in the midst of this 6)_______ turmoil that TQM took root.

The exact 7)_______ of the term «total quality management» is uncertain. It is almost certainly inspired by Armand V. Feigenbaum's multi-edition book Total Quality Control (OCLC 299383303) and Kaoru Ishikawa's What Is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way (OCLC 11467749). It may have been first coined in the United Kingdom by the Department of Trade and Industry 8)_______ its 1983 «National Quality Campaign». Or it may have been first coined in the United States by the Naval Air Systems Command to 9)_______ its quality-improvement efforts in 1985.

 

3. Read the following article and make a rendering of it in English.

История системы менеджмента качества предприятий начинается с постановки конкретной задачи – разработка и внедрение системы, которая может успешно функционировать и развиваться в условиях современного экономического рынка. Для получения сертификата соответствия, существующую систему необходимо усовершенствовать, чтобы она отвечала международным и российским государственным стандартам. Решение о создании системы менеджмента качества принимается высшим руководством предприятия.

Конструирование и проектирование такой системы менеджмента качества может растянуться не на один год. История создания СМК начинается с масштабной работы: составление плана развития на последующие годы, разработка политики в сфере качества, создание базы нормативов системы менеджмента качества и правил корректировки управленческих процессов. Разрабатываются и запускаются механизмы с целью регулярного и поэтапного анализа документов и результатов деятельности организации. Внедряется система производственного планирования, включающая в себя три последовательных уровня: производственный план направления деятельности, план отдельного управления или отдела и частный ресурсный план каждого сотрудника. Определяются цели и показатели эффективности деятельности по разным направлениям.

Для сертификации системы менеджмента качества высшим руководством предприятия выбирается уполномоченный орган по сертификации. Одним из самых авторитетных органов за всю историю сертификации является корпорация «ТЮФ Тюринген».

После внутренней проверки системы менеджмента качества на соответствие требованиям международного стандарта, приглашается сторонняя организация для проведения предсертификационных экспертиз и аудитов. Если при внешней проверке существенных отклонений от образца не обнаруживается, а незначительные поправки и рекомендации оперативно учитываются с последующим внесением соответствующих изменений в систему, предприятие успешно проходит сертификационную экспертизу. Документы, выданные контролирующей организацией, подтверждают то, что система менеджмента качества отвечает всем запросам стандарта международного уровня DIN EN ISO 9001:2000. Проверку осуществляют зарубежные эксперты с мировым именем, имеющие богатый опыт сертифицирования большого количества аналогичных инжиниринговых компаний разных стран, в том числе и европейских.

Но получение сертификата соответствия – это лишь первый этап в истории системы менеджмента качества (СМК), означающий, что система разработана и требует дальнейшего развития и внедрения инновационных решений. В течение трех лет, после получения сертификата, аудиторы проводят различные проверки, которые подтверждают динамику развития системы в положительном направлении.

Срок действия данного сертификата – три года. Для его пролонгации проводится ресертификационный аудит, который требует от внедренной предприятием системы менеджмента уже принципиально иного уровня.

Сведения о «TUV CERT» («ТЮФ СЕРТ») – немецком органе по сертификации.

Организация начала свою историю деятельности в 1866 году. В ее обязанности входил контроль работы паровых котлов. В частности проведение исследований в области вредного воздействия их на человека и разработка методов, сводящих к минимуму такое воздействие. Успешная деятельность компании способствовала сокращению государством собственного ведомственного контроля во многих направлениях, поручив TUV CERT надзор за другими опасными техническими объектами. На сегодняшний день «ТЮФ» является крупнейшим мировым сертификационным центром, членом «Independent International Organization for Certification» – независимой международной организации по сертификации.

 

Part B

The history of quality management, from mere «inspection» to Total Quality Management, and its modern «branded interpretations such as «Six Sigma»,  has led to the development of essential processes, ideas, theories and tools that are central to organizational development, change management, and the performance improvements that are generally desired for individuals, teams and organizations.

These free resources, materials and tools are an excellent guide to the quality management area, for practical application in organizations, for study and learning, and for teaching and training others.

These free pdf materials are provided by permission of the UK Department of Industry – now the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform – which is gratefully acknowledged. The materials listed and linked from this page are subject to Crown Copyright.

Please note that since the replacement of the UK Department of Industry by the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, the branding on the materials is now obsolete. Nevertheless, since the Quality Management technical and historical content is unaffected by the DTI branding the materials remain relevant for training, learning and reference.

It is appropriate to note the passing a little while back now, of Joseph Juran, a seminal figure in the history of quality management, who died 28 February 2008, age 103. Juran did more than teach the Japanese about quality management. He was also arguably the first quality expert to emphasise that no quality management system works unless people are empowered and committed to take responsibility for quality – as an ongoing process – effectively for quality to become part of part of people's behaviour and attitudes – an ethos. The section below on Kaizen explains the connections between the true ethos of quality management, and the positive ethical management of people.

Further total quality management information and quality management terminology explanations are on the Six Sigma page.

The roots of Total Quality Management can be traced to early 1920's production quality control ideas, and notably the concepts developed in Japan beginning in the late 1940's and 1950's, pioneered there by Americans Feigenbum, Juran and Deming... More about Quality Management and TQM history.

Quality Management resulted mainly from the work of the quality gurus and their theories: the American gurus featured in the 1950's Japan: Joseph Juran, W Edwards Deming, and Armand Feigenbum; the Japanese quality gurus who developed and extended the early American quality ideas and models: Kaoru Ishikawa, Genichi Taguchi, and Shigeo Shingo; and the 1970-80's American Western gurus, notably Philip Crosby and Tom Peters, who further extended the Quality Management concepts after the Japanese successes... More about the Quality Management gurus and their theories, including the development and/or use of the Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA) cycle, Pareto analysis, cause and effect diagrams, stratification, check-sheets, histograms, scatter-charts, process control charts, system design, parameter design, tolerance design ('Taguchi methodology'), Quality Improvement Teams (QIT), Just In Time (JIT), Management By Walking About (MBWA), McKinsey 7-S Framework, etc.

Total Quality Management features centrally the customer-supplier interfaces, (external and internal customers and suppliers). A number of processes sit at each interface. Central also is an organizational commitment to quality, and the importance of communicating this quality commitment, together with the acknowledgement that the right organizational culture is essential for effective Total Quality Management.... More about the fundamentals and structures of the TQM model, including the people, processes and systems in the organization.

Understanding processes is essential before attempt is made to improve them. This is a central aspect to Total Quality Management, and also to more modern quality and process improvement interpretations and models such as Six Sigma.... More about Total Quality Management process and process improvement methods.

A wide range of tools and techniques is used for identifying, measuring, prioritising and improving processes which are critical to quality. Again these ideas and methods feature prominently in modern interpretations of Total Quality Management methodology, such as Six Sigma. These process improvement tools and techniques include: DRIVE (Define, Review, Identify, Verify, Execute), process mapping, flow-charting, force field analysis, cause and effect, brainstorming, Pareto analysis, Statistical Process Control (SPC), Control charts, bar charts, «dot plot» and tally charts, check-sheets, scatter diagrams, matrix analysis, histograms..... More about tools and techniques for process evaluation and improvement.

People are a fundamental component within any successfully developing organization. Take away the people and the organization is nothing. Take away the people's motivation, commitment and ability to work together in well-organised teams, and again, the organization is nothing. Conversely, inspire the people to work well, creatively, productively, and the organization can fly. Logically therefore, the development and proper utilization of people are vital to the success of all quality management initiatives. There are a wide range of models that are used in selecting, assessing, training and developing and motivating people, among which are classical models such as Belbin, Myers Briggs Type Indicator (see the personality models section), Bruce Tuckman's «Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing» model, John Adair's Action Centred Leadership model.... More about people and culture within quality management.

A «Total Quality organization» generally benefits from having an effective Quality Management System (QMS). A Quality Management System is typically defined as: «A set of co-ordinated activities to direct and control an organization in order to continually improve the effectiveness and efficiency of its performance». Customer expectations inevitably drive and define «performance» criteria and standards. Therefore Quality Management Systems focus on customer expectations and ongoing review and improvement.... More about Quality Management Systems, what they are, and how to set up a good QMS.

There are many ways to measure organizational performance other than financial output or profit. Modern measurement focuses on the essential activities, resources and other factors – many less intangible than traditional indictors – that impact on final outputs. These include modern methods such as Balanced Scorecard... More about performance measurement, and cost of quality.

The European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Excellence Model® is a useful framework for developing quality and excellence within an organization... More.

Any organization can assess itself provided it has the commitment to so so, and a framework for the self-assessment... Here are some ideas, and a process for quality and excellence self-assessment.

Benchmarking is a widely used term within the field of organizational measurement and management .... Here is an explanation of benchmarking, and a questionnaire by which an organization (or a department or process team) can assess its readiness for benchmarking.

Here is a framework and «blueprint» for the implementation of a quality improvement or «excellence» initiative. It includes the following elements:

• TQM Processes

• Tools and techniques

• People and teamwork

• Quality management system

• Performance measurement

• EFQM Excellence Model®

• Self-assessment

This blueprint for achieving organizational excellence is based on many years of research, education and advisory work in the European Centre for Business Excellence (ECforBE), and the research and education division of Oakland Consulting plc. It is, along with the other resources in this section, information and advice initially from the UK Department of Industry, now replaced by the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.

 

EXERCISES

1. Sum up the main ides of the text and retell it in Russian.

 

2. Read and translate the following word combinations from English into Russian.

Serious accusations of corruption and a lack of transparency, media outlets, voicing public opinion, civil servants working at lower levels in the system hierarchy, The National Association for Local Government Officers, to safeguard the rights of civil servants, to claim better pensions and salaries, to ensure the rise through the ranks within the civil service through open Quality promotion Quality procedures, to inform the public about the social role of government, a Quality communications, political success of regimes, to Quality prompt a debate concerning how the UK might address the emerging situation, to counteract the apparent threat of information broadcast from countries under totalitarian control potential to affect the established political order, the economic crisis, the implementation of mechanized means of industrial Qualityoduction, the Ministry of Information.

 

3. Read the following article and make a rendering of it in English.

История возникновения СМК ведет к началу индустриальной революции, когда был развит однотипный вид деятельности. Например: ремесленник – управлял и контролировал не только разработку и проектирование своей продукции, но и ее производство, продажу и, соответственно, качество.

В ходе промышленной революции в XIX веке в Британии возникали мелкие мастерские, которыми руководили ремесленники. Именно эти ремесленники послужили базой образования первых производственных объединений, хотя в то время это были только объединения приятелей. Первыми, кто организовался в такие объединения еще в далеком 1825 году, были искусные ремесленники, столяры, портные и текстильные производители.

Эра ремесленников длилась примерно до 1910 года. Во время Первой Мировой Войны усиливается значение контроля за качеством из-за отсутствия сильных кадров и использования плохо обученных или вновь поступивших сотрудников.

Между тем, по мере того как развивалась наука, техника и технология, предприятия становились еще крупнее, владелец больше не мог присутствовать постоянно и везде, поэтому решения стали принимать и выполнять другие назначенные лица, но не с той же заинтересованностью, что была бы в случае с ремесленником. Следовательно, значение вопросов качества возрастало, так как теперь не только предприятие ощущало последствия ошибок, но и широкий круг потребителей. Например, ошибка в производстве лекарств могла стать причиной многих смертельных исходов при лечении; неисправность электрического контакта могла парализовать целую промышленность; а неисправность газового оборудования могла вызвать взрыв. Это вызвало необходимость пересмотреть подход к управлению, вызвав потребность в новой системе – системе менеджмента качества (СМК).

По мере того, как на крупных предприятиях расширялся штат сотрудников, создавались различные производственные подразделения, в изготовлении продукции стали принимать участие многочисленные отделы, качество изготовляемой продукции начинало теряться по причине сложности контроля всех подразделений, участвующих в производстве, что отрицательно отражалось на удовлетворении нужд  потребителей.

Под влиянием всего  этого, постепенно, на производствах усиливалась роль инспекции и контроля качества, что привело к формированию отдельных организационных структур, называемых Отделами Контроля Качества, которые и начали осваивать такие области, как стандартизация, предупреждение ошибок и анализ жалоб потребителей. Дальнейшее развитие системы менеджмента качества (СМК) происходило в области надежности инжиниринга, проектирования и разработки изготавливаемой продукции.

 Для стимулирования производства качественных товаров в 1990-х годах появляются многочисленные премии Качества в США, а во многих других странах учреждены ежегодные награды за качество, как например, Европейская Премия Качества, которая присуждается за достигнутые результаты и за перспективы развития.

 

Part C

The roots of Total Quality Management (TQM) can be traced back to early 1920s when statistical theory was first applied to product quality control. This concept was further developed in Japan in the 40s led by Americans, such as Deming, Juran and Feigenbaum. The focus widened from quality of products to quality of all issues within an organisation – the start of TQM.

The following shows the history of Total Quality Management, from inspection to business excellence.

Inspection involves measuring, examining, and testing products, process and services against specified requirements to determine conformity.

The use of inspection has been evident throughout the history of organised production. In the late Middle Ages, special measures were taken to inspect the work of apprentices and journeymen in order to guard the Guild against claims of makeshift or shoddy work.

During the early years of manufacturing, inspection was used to decide whether a worker’s job or a product met the requirements; therefore, acceptable. It was not done in a systematic way, but worked well when the volume of production was reasonably low. However, as organisations became larger, the need for more effective operations became apparent.

In 1911, Frederick W. Taylor helped to satisfy this need. He published «The Principles of Scientific Management» which provided a framework for the effective use of people in industrial organisations. One of Taylor’s concepts was clearly defined tasks performed under standard conditions. Inspection was one of these tasks and

·                   was intended to ensure that no faulty product left the factory or workshop;

·                   focuses on the product and the detection of problems in the product;

·                   involves testing every item to ensure that it complies with product specifications;

·                   is carried out at the end of the production process; and relies on specially trained inspectors.

This movement led to the emergence of a separate inspection department. An important new idea that emerged from this new department was defect prevention, which led to quality control.

Inspection still has an important role in modern quality practices. However, it is no longer seen as the answer to all quality problems. Rather, it is one tool within a wider array. 

Quality Control was introduced to detect and fix problems along the production line to prevent the production of faulty products. Statistical theory played an important role in this area. In the 1920s, Dr W. Shewhart developed the application of statistical methods to the management of quality. He made the first modern control chart and demonstrated that variation in the production process leads to variation in product. Therefore, eliminating variation in the process leads to a good standard of end products.

Statistical Quality Control:

·                   focuses on product and the detection and control of quality problems;

·                   involves testing samples and statistically infers compliance of all products;

·                   is carried out at stages through the production process; and

·                   relies on trained production personnel and quality control professionals.

Shewart’s work was later developed by Deming, Dodge and Roming.  However, manufacturing companies did not fully utilise these techniques until the late 1940s.

In the 1940s, Japanese products were perceived as cheep, shoddy imitations. Japanese industrial leaders recognised this problem and aimed to produce innovative high quality products. They invited a few quality gurus, such as Deming, Juran, and Feigenbaum to learn how to achieve this aim.

Deming suggested that they can achieve their goal in five years; not many Japanese believed him. However, they followed his suggestions. Maybe the Japanese thought it was rude to say that they did not believe Deming. Or maybe they thought it would be embarrassing if they could not follow his suggestions. Whatever reason it was, they took Deming’s and other gurus» advice and never looked back.

In the 1950s, quality control and management developed quickly and became a main theme of Japanese management. The idea of quality did not stop at the management level. Quality circles started in the early 60s. A quality circle is a volunteer group of workers who meet and discuss issues to improve any aspects of workplace, and make presentations to management with their ideas.

A by-product of quality circles was employee motivation . Workers felt that they were involved and heard. Another by-product was the idea of improving not only quality of the products, but also every aspect of organisational issues. This probably was the start of the idea, total quality.

The term «total quality» was used for the first time in a paper by Feigenbaum at the first international conference on quality control in Tokyo in 1969. The term referred to wider issues within an organisation.

Ishikawa also discussed «total quality control» in Japan, which is different from the western idea of total quality. According to his explanation, it means «company-wide quality control» that involves all employees, from top management to the workers, in quality control.

In the 1980s to the 1990s, a new phase of quality control and management began. This became known as Total Quality Management (TQM). Having observed Japan’s success of employing quality issues, western companies started to introduce their own quality initiatives. TQM, developed as a catchall phrase for the broad spectrum of quality-focused strategies, programmes and techniques during this period, became the centre of focus for the western quality movement.

A typical definition of TQM includes phrases such as: customer focus, the involvement of all employees, continuous improvement and the integration of quality management into the total organisation. Although the definitions were all similar, there was confusion. It was not clear what sort of practices, policies, and activities needed to be implemented to fit the TQM definition.

In 1988 a major step forward in quality management was made with the development of the Malcolm Baldrige Award in the United States. The model, on which the award was based, represented the first clearly defined and internationally recognised TQM model.  It was developed by the United States government to encourage companies to adopt the model and improve their competitiveness.  

In response to this, a similar model was developed by the European Foundation of Quality Management in 1992. This EFQM Excellence Model is the framework for the European Quality Award.

While leading organisations compete to win awards, the main purpose of these awards is to encourage more companies to adopt quality management principles. The models are practical tools; they help organisations to measure where they are now and where they want to be in the future. The models also help organisations to create a plan to reduce the gap between these positions. 

Today, hundreds of quality awards and several models exist all over the world. For more information on some of these models, visit «Excellence Models'.

TQM models are often called Business Excellence Models. Also, TQM itself is now often called Business Excellence. This is to distinguish the «new TQM» from the past work on TQM.

As mentioned earlier, there was confusion as to what TQM was in the 80s and early 90s. This was because any business improvement programme was becoming called TQM. Therefore, the name TQM became tarnished.

Business Excellence is really the same as TQM, but with a more clearly defined approach.

Increasing number of organisations, large or small, have become involved in TQM/Business Excellence in the new millennium. The Centre for Organisational Excellence Research (COER), recognised the need for resources devoted to this area and launched the BPIR.com in April 2002.

Today, the BPIR.com members» area provides the most comprehensive information and services related to quality, quality management, TQM and Business Excellence. Whether you are quality practitioner or a manager focussed on business improvement, the resources within the members» area will help you to have a greater impact within your workplace.

 

EXERCISES

1. Sum up the main ides of the text and retell it in Russian.

 

2. Fill in the missing words from the box into the text below.

management       progression       history        products

outputs          industries       number        approach       quality

 

Quality 1)________, as well as any other management area or field of management evolves over the years through a 2)________, which is influenced by the method of management of organizations, namely by different schools and views in the 3)________ of organizing.

The origins of quality management are undoubtedly connected with the production and quality of 4)________, focusing mainly on their own production process and technical control of inputs and 5)________.

Approaches to quality management significantly enforced in the automotive and aerospace 6)________, as the products must have a high degree of reliability in the first mentioned case, together with a high level of competition. Original American School was developed in the fifties by a 7)________ of Japanese authors and companies, starting in the approach of quality to promote the customer’s perspective.

The Japanese 8)________ to quality in the industry has become an almost standard instrument. It was not until the early eighties that approaches to 9)________ standards (ISO 9000 in 1987) are evident.

The table below shows the key milestones, personalities, their works and the main ideas that shaped the history of quality management.

 

3. Read the following article and make a rendering of it in English.

Науке известно, что управление существовало еще в древнем Шумере пять тысяч лет назад. Однако управление в древности сильно отличалось от современного. Например, было меньше руководителей среднего звена, малочисленной была группа руководителей высшего эвена, имеющих право принимать решения. Очень часто руководство осуществлялось одним человеком.

Есть в истории и примеры организации с формализованными структурами, которые управлялись так же, как они управляются в наше время. Примером может быть римская католическая церковь, где существует структура, установленная еще основателями христианства.

Но до XX в. никто не задумывался над тем, чтобы организациями управлять системно. Понимание этого вынашивалось в течение длительного времени, начиная с середины XIX в. и до 20-х годов XX в.

Отправной точкой развития современного менеджмента считают 1866 год. В этом году бизнесмен Г. Таун выступил на собрании Американского общества инженеров-механиков с докладом «Инженер как экономист». В этом докладе впервые говорилось о необходимости менеджмента как профессиональной специализации и научной дисциплины. Доклад произвел большое впечатление на присутствующего на нем инженера-механика Ф.У. Тейлора и явился стимулом для создания им теории научного менеджмента.

До Тейлора понятие менеджмента носило весьма обобщенный характер. Он впервые определил его как «рациональную организацию вообще» или «организацию производства» по отношению к промышленному предприятию. Теория возникла в условиях монополистического капитализма. Рост масштабов и концентрация производства требовали стандартизации и унификации всего производственного процесса. Дальнейший рост эффективности производства стал немыслим без всесторонней рационализации экономики, времени и ресурсов.

Ф. Тейлор, А. Файоль, Г. Эмерсон, Г. Форд, дополняя друг друга, создали теорию научного менеджмента. Ее основатели пришли к созданию теории на основе своей практической деятельности, работая в качестве инженеров и администраторов на промышленных предприятиях. Затем опробированные эмпирическим путем принципы привели к созданию теории.

Ф. Тейлор сосредоточивал свое внимание на цеховом управлении. Г. Эмерсон и Г. Форд – на всем производственном процессе, А. Файоль занимался организацией управленческого труда на высших его ступенях.

Школа человеческих отношений во главу своего учения ставит человеческий фактор. Основателями этой школы были Мэри Паркер Фоллетт и Элтон Мэйо. Определение менеджмента как обеспечение выполнения работы с помощью других лиц впервые было дано М. Фоллетт.

Представитель школы человеческих отношений Д. Макгрегор выдвинул два подхода к организации управления: первый основан на применении принуждения и поощрения («кнута и пряника»), второй – на создании условий стимулирования у работников инициативы, изобретательности и самостоятельности в достижении целей организации.

В 50-е годы нашего столетия активно начали развиваться такие науки, как психология и социология. Одновременно совершенствовались и методы исследования поведения человека в производственном коллективе. Этими исследованиями в США занимались такие крупные исследователи, как Крис Арджирис, Ренсис Лайкерт, Дуглас Макгрегор, Фредерик Герцберг.

Объектами этих и других исследователей были различные аспекты социального взаимодействия, мотивации к труду, характера власти и авторитета, организационной структуры, линии связи в организациях, лидерства, изменение содержание работы и качества трудовой жизни.

Если школа человеческих отношений сосредоточивала свое внимание главным образом на методах налаживания межличностных отношений, то новый подход стремился в большей степени оказать помощь работнику в осознании своих собственных возможностей. Методы изучения работника основывались на применении науки о поведении к построению и управлению организациями. Главной целью школы поведенческих наук было повышение эффективности предприятия (организации) за счет повышения эффективности человеческого фактора (человеческих ресурсов).

В отличие от западного, история российского менеджмента измеряется годами.

Менеджмент как система управления в нашей стране стал развиваться с приходом к власти Н.С. Хрущева. С. Хрущев пытался изменить организацию экономики и управление ей с помощью совнархозов. Его политика была направлена на расшатывание жесткой управленческой вертикали, монополии центра: ей противопоставлялось множество экономических субъектов, имевших возможность относительно самостоятельно принимать часть решений. Важно и то, что во времена Н.С. Хрущева получил формальное признание принцип экономической заинтересованности работников, который пришел на смену сталинскому принципу «голого энтузиазма».

Советская экономическая система 1960-х гг. успешно развивалась, а проводимые технологические преобразования требовали поиска новых, более гибких методов управления.